SynthesisSystematic reviews2026
Efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of Adverse Events Associated with MET TKIs in Patients with Advanced NSCLC: A Podcast Discussion.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly for patients ineligible for stem-cell transplantation or CAR T-cell therapy. Loncastuximab tesirine, a CD19-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated promising single-agent activity in recent studies and is approved in this setting. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL.
methodsA systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until March 2025. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy with defined efficacy and safety endpoints were included. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including three clinical trials and four observational cohort studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Pooled analyses were conducted in R (version 4.5.1) using absolute risk and random-effects modeling. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I
resultsThe pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 47.3% (95% CI 33.5-61.3%), and the complete response (CR) rate was 22.0% (95% CI 16.7-27.7%). One-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 48.2% (95% CI 17.8-79.3%) and 31.2% (95% CI 9.2-58.9%), respectively, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. In the clinical trial subgroup, ORR and CR were 47.3% (95% CI 33.3-61.5%) and 23.9% (95% CI 21.9-26.1%), while 1-year OS and PFS were 43.8% (95% CI 25.2-63.3%) and 28.0% (95% CI 14.6-43.8%), respectively. No publication bias was detected. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 98.7% of patients, with grade ≥ 3 events in 82.6%. Common hematologic AEs included anemia (47.7%; grade ≥ 3: 13.6%), leukopenia (16%, grade ≥ 3: 9.7%), neutropenia (32.9%; grade ≥ 3: 22.4%), and thrombocytopenia (24.3%; grade ≥ 3: 16.1%). Frequent non-hematologic AEs included fatigue (20%), fever (15.6%), vomiting (12.4%), and abdominal pain (11.4%). Other reported events included hypokalemia (25.5%), rash (20%), and peripheral edema (23.7%).
conclusionThis meta-analysis supports the efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in heavily pretreated R/R DLBCL, with an ORR of ~ 47% and manageable toxicity. These findings reinforce its role as a valuable treatment option in patients with limited alternatives and highlight the need for randomized studies to optimize patient selection and sequencing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.