Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244000›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

Participants' and physiotherapists' views on the delivery of a randomised controlled feasibility trial investigating a bespoke dynamic elastomeric fabric orthosis for women with chronic pelvic girdle pain: a qualitative exploration.

Bradley Halliday, Jennifer Freeman, Sarah Chatfield, Lee Cameron, Kirsty Carter, Jo Hosking, Jill Shawe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bradley HallidayFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Intercity Place, North Road East, Plymouth, PL4 6AB, England. bradley.halliday@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-108X
Jennifer FreemanFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Intercity Place, North Road East, Plymouth, PL4 6AB, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-9758
Sarah ChatfieldFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Intercity Place, North Road East, Plymouth, PL4 6AB, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6529-4893
Lee CameronAneurin Bevan University Health Board, Gwent, Wales.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1406-8500
Kirsty CarterCornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Cornwall, England.
Jo HoskingFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Intercity Place, North Road East, Plymouth, PL4 6AB, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7090-0205
Jill ShaweFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Intercity Place, North Road East, Plymouth, PL4 6AB, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2766-7302

Funding

Research for Patient Benefit Programme NIHR201930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) affects approximately 10-30% of postpartum women beyond 3 months. Such pain is typically recalcitrant to standard care. A dynamic elastomeric fabric orthosis (DEFO) is one option. A feasibility randomised controlled trial (fRCT) assessed the feasibility and acceptability of trial design, interventions and data collection. The aim of this qualitative sub-study was to explore the experience of women participating in the feasibility trial, and physiotherapists delivering the trial intervention.

methodsAn embedded qualitative study within a fRCT. The fRCT randomised participants to either control (standard care involving advice and exercise) or intervention (standard care and DEFO), across three healthcare trusts in three regions of England. Delivery of all interventions and data collection was undertaken remotely. Participants were encouraged to wear the DEFO for a maximum of 12 h a day over the 24-weeks of the trial. The qualitative approach involved online, semi-structured interviews supported by a topic guide. Data was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsSeven (n = 5 intervention, n = 2 control) of 24 participants recruited to the fRCT and five of the seven physiotherapists involved in the trial intervention delivery participated. Four main themes were identified: "acceptability of trial methods", "intervention acceptability", "impact of intervention" and "adherence to exercise". Data collection methods were acceptable using the web-based app. The virtual nature of the trial was acceptable; however, women and physiotherapists would have preferred at least one face-to-face intervention session. The DEFO was acceptable to women, providing them with a sense of support "holding them together". They felt it increased awareness of their ability to move, enabling them to be more physically active. Physiotherapists' felt the process of delivery of the DEFO was acceptable but felt the range of available exercises they could prescribe was restrictive. Physiotherapists and participants found the advice component required further development. Participants struggled to maintain adherence to the prescribed exercise programme over the 24-week period.

conclusionsThe remote trial procedures and interventions were generally acceptable to both participants and physiotherapists, supporting the overall trial design and implementation, but a future design should incorporate an in-person treatment component. The participant's experiences and suggestions will be considered in the design and delivery of a future definitive trial.

trial registrationISRCTN67232113.

Indexed as

FeasibilityPelvic girdle painQualitativeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42244000
PMCPMC13455307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.