Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243987›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026

Is postoperative ARDS different from medical ARDS?

Joris Pensier, Julie Henry, Yassir Aarab, Mathieu Capdevila, Inès Lakbar, Clément Monet, Aurélie Vonarb, James Carson, Gérald Chanques, Nicolas Molinari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joris PensierAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Julie HenryAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Yassir AarabAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Mathieu CapdevilaAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Inès LakbarAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Clément MonetAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Aurélie VonarbAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, 34295, France.
James CarsonAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Gérald ChanquesAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Nicolas MolinariDépartement d'informatique Médicale, Institut Desbrest de Santé Publique (IDESP) INSERM - Université de Montpellier, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Audrey De JongAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Samir JaberAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France. s-jaber@chu-montpellier.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative patients have been underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whether postoperative ARDS differs from medical ARDS in its clinical trajectory, outcomes, and prognostic determinants remains unclear. We aimed to compare postoperative and medical ARDS with respect to early trajectory, mortality, and risk factors for mortality.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a tertiary ICU from 2003 to 2023. All consecutive intubated adults fulfilling the ARDS New Global Definition were included. ARDS cases were labeled as postoperative when onset occurred within 15 days after surgery. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, assessed with multivariable Cox analysis. Early ARDS trajectories were assessed at day 3. Multivariable Cox analyses were used to identify factors independently associated with mortality.

resultsAmong 1,077 intubated ARDS patients, 455(42%) had postoperative ARDS. Compared with medical ARDS, postoperative ARDS showed more favorable early trajectories (p = 0.03) and lower 90-day mortality (36% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Postoperative ARDS remained independently associated with lower 90-day mortality after adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio[aHR] = 0.68, 95%CI:0.56-0.83, p < 0.001). Prognostic determinants differed markedly. In postoperative ARDS, mortality was independently associated with extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (non-respiratory SOFA score: aHR = 1.10, 95%CI:1.05-1.15; bicarbonate: aHR = 0.81 per 5mmol/L, 95%CI:0.69-0.96) and surgical context, (esophageal surgery: aHR = 0.41, 95%CI:0.24-0.70; upper abdominal surgery: aHR = 0.64, 95%CI:0.46-0.91 versus lower abdominal surgery), while no marker of respiratory failure was independently associated with mortality. In medical ARDS, mortality was independently associated with respiratory failure, including PaO

conclusionPostoperative ARDS differs from medical ARDS in its early clinical trajectory, outcomes, and prognostic determinants. These findings support postoperative ARDS as a distinct clinical subtype, mainly driven by extrapulmonary and surgery-related factors rather than by the lung injury itself, supporting a management approach focused on perioperative prevention and early identification of surgery-related complications.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsRespiratory Distress SyndromeAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAcute respiratory distress syndromeIntensive care unitPerioperative carePhenotypingVentilation

Identifiers

PMID42243987
PMCPMC13267213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.