Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243974›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026

Preventing smoking initiation among vulnerable adolescents: a process evaluation of the KickAsh!-intervention in Flemish youth social work settings.

Babette Demeester, Sara Willems, Kenji Leta, Peter A J Stevens, Maïté Verloigne, Emelien Lauwerier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05920772 (Preventing Smoking Initiation in Adolescents Living in Vulnerable Socioeconomic Situations), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05920772 naunknown statusnot on this map

Preventing Smoking Initiation in Adolescents Living in Vulnerable Socioeconomic Situations: a Study Protocol of the KickAsh! Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2023 to 2024Enrolled720ConditionsSmoking Cigarette, Smoking Tobacco, Smoking, Smoking PreventionArmsKickAsh! intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Babette DemeesterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Sint- Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent, 9000, Belgium. babette.demeester@ugent.be.
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Sint- Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent, 9000, Belgium.
Kenji LetaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Sint- Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent, 9000, Belgium.
Peter A J StevensDepartment of Social Sciences, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent, 9000, Belgium.
Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Sint- Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent, 9000, Belgium.
Emelien LauwerierDepartment of Psychology, Open University, Valkenburgerweg 177, Heerlen, 6419 AT, the Netherlands.

Funding

Kom op tegen Kanker 12339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking disparities remain a global concern, with adolescents experiencing societal vulnerability at increased risk of cigarette smoking initiation. Persistent inequities suggest that prevention interventions often fail to engage these adolescents, partly because they insufficiently reflect their everyday environments and social contexts. Although schools are commonly used settings, their impact is often limited for this group, underscoring the need for more context-sensitive approaches and to explore complementary settings. To address this, the KickAsh!-intervention was co-created with adolescents and youth workers within youth social work organisations. In an accompanying paper, the effectiveness study of KickAsh! showed no significant effects, highlighting the need to examine how the intervention was implemented in practice. This study therefore presents a process evaluation, aiming to understand the mechanisms underlying its (lack of) effects and how implementation interacts with context in real-world settings.

methodsKickAsh! was implemented across eight youth social work organisations. Qualitative data were collected through seven focus groups with adolescents (n = 52) and eight interviews with youth workers (n = 8). Framework analysis enabled systematic organisation of data, cross-case comparison, and identification of deeper themes.

resultsSeven themes emerged: (1) perceptions of the intervention and its impact, (2) preferences and the importance of adaptability, (3) influence of youth workers' smoking status, (4) influence of their skills and motivation, (5) organisational structure and context, (6) addressing smoking within youth social work, and (7) participation and co-creation.

conclusionImplementation of the KickAsh!-intervention varied substantially across youth social work organisations due to interacting individual, organisational, and intervention-related factors, highlighting its strong context dependency. This variability may explain the limited observed effects, although the intervention appeared to foster important unmeasured outcomes such as awareness, open dialogue, and organisational capacity. The development and refinement of a theory of change further underscored that inconsistent implementation and limited fidelity were key drivers of these findings, alongside broader contextual influences. Youth workers played a pivotal role, as their characteristics, skills, and capacity largely determined success. Embedding flexibility to adapt the intervention to each organisation's specific context and needs appears crucial for feasibility, impact, and sustainability. TRAIL REGISTRATION: This study is part of a larger project that includes the development, implementation and evaluation of the KickAsh!-intervention. The study protocol of this project is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05920772).

Indexed as

AdolescentsCo-creationHealth promotionLow socioeconomic statusProcess evaluationSmoking preventionYouth workers

Identifiers

PMID42243974
PMCPMC13455221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.