ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal cancer (EC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Accurate staging, treatment planning, and prognostic assessment are essential for improving clinical management and patient outcomes. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) approaches integrating clinicopathological, imaging, and genomic data have shown considerable potential in these areas. MAIN BODY: Over the past two years, research in this field has advanced rapidly, supported by the growing availability of large datasets and increasing adoption of multicenter external validation. Recent studies suggest that AI can improve real-time diagnosis and enhance the prediction of treatment response in patients with EC.
conclusionsThis review summarizes recent advances in AI applications for esophageal cancer, discusses current challenges, and highlights future directions for research and clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.