ArticleGenome biology2026
TestNet: a method for inferring microbial networks with false discovery rate control for clustered and unclustered samples.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most existing methods for inferring microbial networks generate only point estimates of Pearson's correlations without assessing their significance, and none accounts for clustering. We introduce TestNet, a novel method that delivers well-calibrated results by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). TestNet uses a permutation-based procedure to generate valid null replicates that account for compositional effects, excess zeros in microbiome data, and clustering within samples when present. Our results demonstrate that TestNet is the only evaluated method that effectively controls the FDR while maintaining high power across a wide range of scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.