Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243952›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026

Non-invasive model for predicting future lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on imaging heterogeneity analysis.

Han Wu, Yuxuan Yang, Yuan Chen, Zhenli Liao, Wei Zhao, Guanghui Luo, Kai Tang, Yurong Jiang, Qiyang Li, Ziyao Jia and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Han Wu *Department of Radiology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology), No. 79 Kangning Road, Zhuhai, China.
Yuxuan Yang *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan Chen *Department of Interventional Treatment, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.
Zhenli Liao *Department of Radiology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology), No. 79 Kangning Road, Zhuhai, China.
Wei ZhaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai People's Hospital (The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University), Zhuhai, China.
Guanghui LuoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau, China.
Kai TangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai People's Hospital (The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University), Zhuhai, China.
Yurong JiangDepartment of Radiology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology), No. 79 Kangning Road, Zhuhai, China.
Qiyang LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Sciences and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Ziyao JiaThe First Clinical School of Medicine, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Mengfan PanThe First Clinical School of Medicine, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wanli HuangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Yangjiang People's Hospital, Yangjiang, China.
Sirui FuDepartment of Radiology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University (Zhuhai People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology), No. 79 Kangning Road, Zhuhai, China. fusiruismu@sina.com.
Chongyang DuanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. donyduang@126.com.
Liang ChenDepartment of Radiology, the Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China. nbhydz@hotmail.com.

Funding

Clinical Research Promotion Project of Zhuhai People's Hospital 2023LCTS-06 and 2023LCTS-07Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2023A1515011384National Natural Science Foundation of China 62027901, 82272069, and 82273727Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou 202201011478Technology Plan Project in the Field of Social Development in Zhuhai 2320004000256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are at high risk of lung metastasis, which is the only site significantly affecting survival among extrahepatic metastases. However, current HCC lung metastasis researches predominantly focus on biological or pathological heterogeneity through invasive biopsies, which are unsuitable for continuous and dynamic monitoring. Consequently, imaging heterogeneity should also be evaluated.

methodsFrom five centers, 352 HCC cases were divided into training and test datasets. Combining backward stepwise hazard models with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method, a clinical imaging heterogeneity model (CIH-Model) was constructed using clinical indicators and imaging parameters (including tumor location, peritumor, intratumor, and enhancement pattern) and tested the model's discrimination and calibration. Patients were categorized according to CIH-Model scores, and the time to lung metastasis and overall survival (OS) were compared between categories. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine whether subgroup was an independent predictor of OS.

resultsThe areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of the CIH-Model for predicting one-, two- and three-years lung metastasis free survival were 0.78, 0.92, and 0.87 (training) and 0.72, 0.72, and 0.71 (test), respectively, with sufficient calibration in both datasets. Subgroups separated according to the median CIH-Model score showed significant differences in time to lung metastasis (training, hazard ratio[HR]: 6.271, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.225-12.200, p < 0.001; test, HR: 2.862; 95% CI: 1.436-5.705, p = 0.002) and OS (training, HR: 3.723; 95% CI: 2.357-5.881, p < 0.001; test, HR: 4.003; 95% CI: 2.321-6.907, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that subgroup by lung metastasis risk was independently related to OS in the training (HR: 0.435; 95% CI: 0.259-0.730, p = 0.002) and test datasets (HR: 0.341; 95% CI: 0.178-0.653, p = 0.001).

conclusionsAssisted by the CIH-Model, patients with HCC at high risk of future lung metastasis could be identified, and survival risk could be distinguished for appropriate monitoring and timely prevention in these patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedClinical factorsHepatocellular carcinomaImaging heterogeneityLung metastasisRisk prediction model

Identifiers

PMID42243952
PMCPMC13238124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.