ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
An interpretable machine learning model for preoperative risk stratification in paediatric congenital heart disease surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD), one of the most common birth defects, poses challenges to preoperative risk stratification due to its anatomical complexity and developmental vulnerability. Existing tools inadequately predict critical outcomes, including mortality and ventilator dependence. We developed a machine learning-based clinical tool to enable precise preoperative risk assessment.
methodsThis retrospective dual-centre cohort study analysed 1,363 CHD surgical cases (1,033 from Kunming Children's Hospital and 330 from Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital), with 78 preoperative variables collected. Feature selection using the Boruta algorithm and LASSO regression identified key predictors. Nine machine learning models, including Random Forest and XGBoost, were constructed to predict a primary composite outcome and four secondary adverse events. Model performance was assessed using AUC and F1-score with threshold optimisation, and external validation was performed using the independent cohort.
resultsEighteen predictors were selected. For the primary outcome, Random Forest achieved the highest AUC (0.861) and F1-score (0.631). Secondary outcomes showed divergent performance: mortality prediction demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.948), while prolonged hospital stay was predicted moderately (AUC 0.714). SHAP analysis revealed outcome-specific drivers: weight and RACHS-1 category dominated primary outcome risk, whereas mortality was associated with diastolic interventricular septum thickness and the AST/platelet ratio. Mechanical ventilation dependency correlated strongly with the monocyte-lymphocyte ratio.
conclusionFive interpretable Random Forest models were developed and deployed as a web-based tool for preoperative risk stratification in CHD surgery. External validation demonstrated stable predictive performance, and future multicentre prospective studies are planned to further refine model generalisability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.