ArticleBMC psychology2026
Exploring students' emotional experiences and responses to AI tutors and their limitations in higher education: a Self-Determination Theory (SDT) perspective.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA growing body of research underscores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in second language (L2) education. However, the emotional side of adopting AI tutors in the English as a foreign language (EFL) context has received insufficient scholarly attention. PURPOSE: To address this knowledge gap, this qualitative study sought to uncover EFL students' emotional experiences and responses to AI tutors.
methodTo do so, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 Chinese EFL students recruited through a convenience sampling strategy.
resultsThe results of the thematic analysis indicated different positive and negative emotional experiences associated with the adoption of AI tutors. The most common positive affective-motivational states were excitement, motivation, and engagement, while the negative emotions, anxiety, fear, and frustration, appeared most frequently in the learners. Additionally, it was revealed that, in response to the limitations of AI tutors, the participants exhibited four major emotional reactions: resentment, distrust, disengagement, and demotivation. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: The study highlights the importance of considering learner emotions and emotionality when teaching English through AI tutors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.