ArticleBMC psychology2026
Resilience and burnout among dual-role staff in a Chinese closed prison hospital during COVID-19.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo deeply explore the resilience of job burnout among staff in a closed management prison hospital in China during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to identify the influencing factors of resilience and its dynamic relationship with job burnout.
methodsA paper questionnaire survey was conducted. From June to July 2020, 200 prison staff from a prison hospital in Chongqing, China, were selected by random sampling method for the survey, and the results were statistically analyzed using SPSS statistical software.
resultsThere were significant differences in resilience between different prison wards, with the second ward having lower resilience than the administrative office, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the second ward also had lower resilience than the third ward, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Positive coping (β = 0.364, 95%CI:0.447 ~ 1.112) and General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES) (β = 0.346, 95%CI:0.498 ~ 1.102) were positively correlated with resilience (p < 0.05). There was no correlation with psychoticism, social support, job burnout, prison wards, or neuroticism (p > 0.05).
conclusionThis study identified regional differences in Chongqing prison staff's resilience, which correlates positively with positive coping and GSES but not directly with job burnout. Practically, target support for low-resilience units and integrate relevant training into routines to boost adversity adaptation. For prison hospital construction, address internal regional psychological impacts, establish job rotation and dynamic psychological assessment mechanisms, and optimize work environment and occupational security to build a "psychological support + institutional guarantee" model, informing national standardized development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.