Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243917›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

The Richards Trauma Process: a before-after single-arm feasibility trial of a novel psychotherapy.

Petrina Barson, Peter MacIsaac, Lena Sanci, Meredith Temple-Smith, Judy Trevena, Adrian Laughlin, Patty Chondros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Petrina BarsonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Level 2, Medical Building 181, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. petrina.barson@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-5794
Peter MacIsaac, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-0307
Lena SanciDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Level 2, Medical Building 181, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-4737
Meredith Temple-SmithDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Level 2, Medical Building 181, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-9591
Judy TrevenaDepartment of Psychiatry, Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, 246 Clayton Rd., Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-0335
Adrian LaughlinDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Level 2, Medical Building 181, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3545-4785
Patty ChondrosDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Level 2, Medical Building 181, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-8734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Richards Trauma Process (TRTP) is a novel, very brief transdiagnostic psychotherapy that uses innovative methods to work with parts of the self to reprocess traumatic memories without using exposure techniques. Our objectives were to explore the feasibility of studying this therapy in a community setting, to document the safety and acceptability of TRTP, and to gather preliminary indications of outcomes in adults presenting with elevated levels of psychological distress.

methodsThis was a before-after single-arm trial of TRTP in consecutive new adult clients presenting to a psychotherapist in Australia. Inclusion criteria were at least mildly elevated levels of depression, anxiety, stress or trauma symptoms; no previous diagnosis of psychosis, Bipolar Disorder or Personality Disorder; and ability to maintain sobriety during the therapy. Feasibility was assessed against 15 criteria relating to 5 broad objectives, evaluating: (1) recruitment and retention capability, (2) data collection procedures, (3) resourcing, (4) acceptability and safety of TRTP, and (5) change in scores. Regarding objective 5, we estimated the mean change in scores on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS21) and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) between follow-up and baseline; and to check for harms (objective 4) we used descriptive statistics to look for clinically meaningful deterioration in individual scores or participants.

resultsOf 40 new clients, 23 (58%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 41% to 73%) were eligible, consented to the study and commenced TRTP. Of these, 20 (87%; 95% CI 65% to 97%) completed TRTP (averaging six hours of therapy) and follow-up 1-month post-therapy. Eleven of 15 feasibility criteria were met. Unmet criteria could be addressed in a future efficacy trial by modifications to study procedures. All mean scores changed in the desired direction, with no individual scores or participants demonstrating clinically meaningful deterioration.

conclusionsThis is the first study that supports the feasibility of a larger trial of TRTP in a community setting. We demonstrated that recruitment and retention of participants, and data collection, were feasible, and that the intervention was acceptable, safe, and worthy of further study. Learnings for a future trial were identified.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered with The Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625001423404).

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionFeasibilityPsychotherapyPTSDThe Richards Trauma ProcessTrauma

Identifiers

PMID42243917
PMCPMC13576242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.