ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026
The Richards Trauma Process: a before-after single-arm feasibility trial of a novel psychotherapy.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Richards Trauma Process (TRTP) is a novel, very brief transdiagnostic psychotherapy that uses innovative methods to work with parts of the self to reprocess traumatic memories without using exposure techniques. Our objectives were to explore the feasibility of studying this therapy in a community setting, to document the safety and acceptability of TRTP, and to gather preliminary indications of outcomes in adults presenting with elevated levels of psychological distress.
methodsThis was a before-after single-arm trial of TRTP in consecutive new adult clients presenting to a psychotherapist in Australia. Inclusion criteria were at least mildly elevated levels of depression, anxiety, stress or trauma symptoms; no previous diagnosis of psychosis, Bipolar Disorder or Personality Disorder; and ability to maintain sobriety during the therapy. Feasibility was assessed against 15 criteria relating to 5 broad objectives, evaluating: (1) recruitment and retention capability, (2) data collection procedures, (3) resourcing, (4) acceptability and safety of TRTP, and (5) change in scores. Regarding objective 5, we estimated the mean change in scores on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS21) and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) between follow-up and baseline; and to check for harms (objective 4) we used descriptive statistics to look for clinically meaningful deterioration in individual scores or participants.
resultsOf 40 new clients, 23 (58%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 41% to 73%) were eligible, consented to the study and commenced TRTP. Of these, 20 (87%; 95% CI 65% to 97%) completed TRTP (averaging six hours of therapy) and follow-up 1-month post-therapy. Eleven of 15 feasibility criteria were met. Unmet criteria could be addressed in a future efficacy trial by modifications to study procedures. All mean scores changed in the desired direction, with no individual scores or participants demonstrating clinically meaningful deterioration.
conclusionsThis is the first study that supports the feasibility of a larger trial of TRTP in a community setting. We demonstrated that recruitment and retention of participants, and data collection, were feasible, and that the intervention was acceptable, safe, and worthy of further study. Learnings for a future trial were identified.
trial registrationRetrospectively registered with The Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625001423404).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.