ArticleBMC health services research2026
Physiotherapists' perception of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital health interventions: a scoping review.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital health interventions (DHIs) hold significant potential to enhance physiotherapy by improving patient engagement, enabling remote care, and optimizing treatment outcomes. Despite their benefits, the slow pace of implementation indicates barriers to the adoption of DHIs. Together with the limited research on physiotherapists' perspectives, this highlights the need to address barriers and facilitators to their integration. Understanding these factors is crucial for advancing the effective use of DHIs in physiotherapy practice.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify and map barriers and facilitators to the implementation of DHIs in physiotherapy, as perceived by physiotherapists.
methodsThe JBI methodological framework and the JBI reviewer's manual guided the review process. MEDLINE Ovid and Embase Ovid were the primary databases, with BASE used for grey literature; the search process was completed in May 2024. Barriers and facilitators were mapped to the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
resultsThe review included 45 publications spanning 2017 to 2024. A total of 334 barrier instances and 134 facilitator instances were identified across all five CFIR domains. Key factors affecting the implementation of DHIs in physiotherapy were highlighted, including the need for adaptable, well-designed, and compliant interventions, as well as supportive reimbursement systems and adequate funding. In addition, successful DHI integration in clinical practice is influenced by reliable technology, technical training, institutional investment, and an open attitude toward technology.
conclusionThe findings indicate that successful DHI integration within physiotherapy services may require coordinated action across organizational, workforce, and policy domains. Health system strategies that address infrastructure capacity, digital competencies, and reimbursement models appear critical to translating digital innovation into routine service delivery, though further research examining objective implementation outcomes is warranted. REGISTRATION: OSF (https://osf.io/abhxr).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.