ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Multidimensional evaluation of a two-level-of-compliance quasi-passive prosthetic wrist: functional, biomechanical, cognitive and user-experience outcomes in trans-radial limb loss.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in upper limb prosthetics have expanded functional capabilities for individuals with trans-radial limb loss, yet compensatory movements remain common due to mobility limitations of current prosthetic devices. This study evaluated the functional performance of a quasi-passive prosthetic wrist with two degrees of freedom and adjustable compliance operating according to the Synchronous Hand-Wrist Operation principle (compliant during reaching and automatically stiffening at grasp onset), focusing on clinical function, compensatory strategies, cognitive workload and user experience.
methodsSix male prosthetic users (53 ± 13 years) completed two experimental sessions on consecutive days. Session one included familiarization and clinical evaluation using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). In session two, compensatory strategies were assessed during six standardized manual tasks using motion capture (Vicon, UK) and compared against age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Prosthetic users performed all procedures with the device in compliant-while-reaching (ON) and full-stiff modes (OFF) in randomized order. Clinical, spatio-temporal and kinematic outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models. Subjective evaluation included the NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), System Usability Scale (SUS) and a custom questionnaire, assessing the overall experience with the device in its intended compliant operating mode.
resultsIn the SHAP, the ON condition yielded significantly lower mean hand functionality scores than OFF (55.0 vs. 58.3, ~ 5% decrease; p = 0.034) and longer completion times in 4/26 items (+ 1.4 s on average, + 18-44%; p < 0.05). Biomechanical analysis showed increased reaching phase duration in ON across all tasks, with minimal increases in total hand trajectory. Task-specific kinematic adaptations were evident: when wrist deviation during grasping occurred in ON, reduced compensations were observed at more proximal joints, bringing joint ranges of motion closer to healthy controls. Additional motor strategies were required, particularly in tasks involving surface interaction or complex hand-object alignment. Subjective evaluations indicated moderate cognitive workload (NASA-TLX: 48/100), above-average usability (SUS: 74/100) and overall positive acceptance.
conclusionsA multi-DoF quasi-passive prosthetic wrist can reduce proximal compensations, although introducing longer execution times and novel motor demands. Functional benefits are strongly task-dependent. These findings stress the importance of balancing added mechanical complexity with usability to optimize clinical outcomes and user satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.