Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243910›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Multidimensional evaluation of a two-level-of-compliance quasi-passive prosthetic wrist: functional, biomechanical, cognitive and user-experience outcomes in trans-radial limb loss.

Eleonora Braccili, Denise Anastasi, Eva Zimei, Marco Notarantonio, Marta Gherardini, Aldo Lazich, Ugo Della Croce, Lorenzo Rum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eleonora BracciliDepartment of Engineering, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Denise AnastasiDepartment of Engineering, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Eva ZimeiDepartment of Engineering, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8686-7235
Marco NotarantonioBioengineering and Human Performance Section, Defense Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Marta GherardiniDepartment of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-5516
Aldo LazichBioengineering and Human Performance Section, Defense Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Ugo Della CroceDepartment of Engineering, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy. dellacro@uniss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5151-7403
Lorenzo RumDepartment of Engineering, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy. l.rum@unilink.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-7514

Funding

Ministero della Difesa M_D ABBE6E3 REG2022 0002861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in upper limb prosthetics have expanded functional capabilities for individuals with trans-radial limb loss, yet compensatory movements remain common due to mobility limitations of current prosthetic devices. This study evaluated the functional performance of a quasi-passive prosthetic wrist with two degrees of freedom and adjustable compliance operating according to the Synchronous Hand-Wrist Operation principle (compliant during reaching and automatically stiffening at grasp onset), focusing on clinical function, compensatory strategies, cognitive workload and user experience.

methodsSix male prosthetic users (53 ± 13 years) completed two experimental sessions on consecutive days. Session one included familiarization and clinical evaluation using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). In session two, compensatory strategies were assessed during six standardized manual tasks using motion capture (Vicon, UK) and compared against age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Prosthetic users performed all procedures with the device in compliant-while-reaching (ON) and full-stiff modes (OFF) in randomized order. Clinical, spatio-temporal and kinematic outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models. Subjective evaluation included the NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), System Usability Scale (SUS) and a custom questionnaire, assessing the overall experience with the device in its intended compliant operating mode.

resultsIn the SHAP, the ON condition yielded significantly lower mean hand functionality scores than OFF (55.0 vs. 58.3, ~ 5% decrease; p = 0.034) and longer completion times in 4/26 items (+ 1.4 s on average, + 18-44%; p < 0.05). Biomechanical analysis showed increased reaching phase duration in ON across all tasks, with minimal increases in total hand trajectory. Task-specific kinematic adaptations were evident: when wrist deviation during grasping occurred in ON, reduced compensations were observed at more proximal joints, bringing joint ranges of motion closer to healthy controls. Additional motor strategies were required, particularly in tasks involving surface interaction or complex hand-object alignment. Subjective evaluations indicated moderate cognitive workload (NASA-TLX: 48/100), above-average usability (SUS: 74/100) and overall positive acceptance.

conclusionsA multi-DoF quasi-passive prosthetic wrist can reduce proximal compensations, although introducing longer execution times and novel motor demands. Functional benefits are strongly task-dependent. These findings stress the importance of balancing added mechanical complexity with usability to optimize clinical outcomes and user satisfaction.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsWristAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaCognitionHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignAmputationKinematicsProsthetic handProsthetic wristRange of motionUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID42243910
PMCPMC13466643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.