ArticleChinese medicine2026
An integrated machine learning framework for TCM five-flavor classification based on E-tongue profiling and SHAP analysis.
Article in Chinese medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe "five-flavor" (wu wei) classification is a core organizing principle in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) pharmacology and quality control, yet its assessment still relies on subjective organoleptic evaluation, limiting standardization and reproducibility.
methodsEighty-four processed herbal slices were analyzed using an electronic tongue to obtain multichannel sensor response profiles. Based on these data, we developed a dual-strategy ensemble learning framework in which a heterogeneous stacking model was trained for five-flavor identification while a voting ensemble was established in parallel for intensity grading. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify feature contributions and to relate prediction outcomes to specific electrochemical response patterns.
resultsOn the independent test set, the stacking ensemble showed moderate and flavor-dependent classification performance, with a macro-AUC of 0.876 and a balanced accuracy of 0.629. Discriminative performance was higher for Bitter and Sweet than for Sour, Salty, and Pungent. Full-stack SHAP analysis further identified P_13 and P_8 as the most influential features overall, with P_13 contributing mainly to the discrimination of bitter and pungent attributes, whereas P_8 was more strongly associated with sour, salty, and sweet characterization.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates a data-driven workflow for digitizing TCM five-flavor assessment. Further validation with expanded sample sizes and chemical corroboration of sensor attributions is needed before operational deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.