ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2026
Full-flexion gap balancing-driven personalized preoperative planning for TKA: biomechanical evidence of improved load symmetry in an in vitro model.
Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConventional morphology-based planning (MB) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often results in imbalanced medial-lateral loading, which is a major risk factor for prosthesis loosening. This study aimed to evaluate a full-flexion gap balance planning (GB) approach and compare its biomechanical performance with MB planning.
methodsTKA surgical planning was performed on eight subjects. In vivo knee kinematics were obtained using a dual X-ray imaging system. The implant position was optimized within an in silico surgical-planning framework by minimizing medial-lateral gap differences across the full flexion range using in vivo dynamic kinematics. Using 3D-printed in vitro models, joint contact forces were measured at various flexion angles to compare medial-lateral load distribution between GB and MB planning.
resultsGB planning optimized femoral varus/valgus by approximately 4° within anatomical constraints, significantly reducing the medial-lateral gap difference to a mean of < 1 mm across the entire flexion range (p < 0.05). In contrast, the medial-lateral gap difference exceeded 2 mm with MB planning. Furthermore, at mid-to-high flexion angles (30°-100°), GB planning reduced the medial-lateral load imbalance by approximately 38%-67% compared with MB planning (p < 0.05).
conclusionGB planning significantly improves medial-lateral load balance across the full range of flexion compared to conventional MB planning. This personalized planning optimizes joint loading patterns in vitro, which may theoretically align with principles aimed at reducing flexion-related adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.