ArticleBMC biotechnology2026
Unveiling a putative class 3 L-asparaginase in Glutamicibacter sp.: from soil isolation to in silico characterization.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType II L-asparaginases are important therapeutic agents for treating childhood leukemia, but numerous side effects of these enzymes, besides neutralization by antibodies due to repeated injection, prompt extensive research to identify alternatives in other classes of this enzyme.
resultsAmong the six asparaginase-producing strains, the best-producing isolate was identified as Glutamicibacter. The asparaginase and glutaminase activities in culture supernatant were 15 U/ml and 1.5 U/ml, respectively. The full-length asparaginase gene was sequenced, and the phylogenetic tree revealed strong clustering with recently identified class 3 asparaginases from Rhizobium etli. The presence of key residues from Class 3 ReAV and ReAIV further confirms this similarity. The AlphaFold 3 server confidently predicted the enzyme's 3D structure. Molecular docking of L-asparagine and L-glutamine using Rosetta revealed binding energies of -9.99 REU for both substrates that were higher than those of the Type IV and V enzymes. Molecular dynamics results indicated that enzyme-Asn was more stable than enzyme-Gln with average RMSD values of 0.33 nm and 0.44 nm, respectively. Enzyme-Asn reached a relatively stable plateau after 0.05 ns, whereas enzyme-Gln showed a sudden jump after 0.75 ns, indicating the separation of glutamine from the protein. A comparison of the antigenic determinants of GlAVI with those of ReAIV, ReAV, EcAII, and ErAII revealed that GlAVI exhibited lower immunogenicity than the other enzymes. Allergenic epitopes were predicted using bioinformatics, demonstrating that nonallergenic epitopes cover a significant portion of the enzyme.
conclusionThe newly isolated Glutamicibacter L-asparaginase appears to be a new type of class 3 asparaginases with high potential for novel therapeutic drug development because of its less and dissimilar immunological properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.