ReviewBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Biobanking: IoT, safety challenges and security prospects.
Review in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biobank is a functional unit that facilitates and improves research by storing biological samples and associated data. As such, it is a key resource for advancing the life sciences. New information and communication technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT), have positively improved biobanks by making it easier to query, share and manage resources. Based on this technology, several biobank management platforms have been created involving sensors that collect metadata and store it in a dedicated database. However, to mitigate the risks of data theft and ensure the confidentiality of data associated with biospecimen donors, the implementation and operation of biobanks require robust IT security mechanisms. The literature abounds with examples demonstrating that blockchain and artificial intelligence techniques have significantly enhanced the protection and reliability of biobank data. We aim to conduct an in-depth review of the advancements and challenges in implementing IoT in biobanking. This review describes the contributions of IoT to real-time sample tracking, improved traceability, and automation of processes from collection to distribution. And then we will propose a detailed reference architecture, that integrating IoT with the best practices in security, interoperability and scalability. Security issues specific to biobanks, such as protecting sensitive data and preventing of unauthorized access, are also considered. The results of this systematic review show that the lack of unified security is a real threat to these connected biobanking systems. From a practical perspective, this study provides a framework for risk assessment and actionable recommendations to strengthen compliance in IoT environments. Finally, this study opens research perspectives on the use of blockchain and artificial intelligence in the security of biological data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.