ArticleBMC health services research2026
Engaging patients in the decarbonisation of primary care: findings from a cross-sectional survey in England.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrimary care accounts for almost a quarter of the National Health Service (NHS) carbon footprint. While general practices are expected to contribute to NHS decarbonisation efforts, little is known about how patients perceive these activities.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted as part of the General Practice Net Zero (GPNET-0) study across twelve general practices in three Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in England. Adult patients who had recently attended their general practice completed an online or paper survey assessing: awareness of climate change and health, perceptions of general practice responsibility for reducing emissions, willingness to engage in sustainability-aligned behaviours if suggested by practice staff; and perceived barriers to action. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively overall and by ICB.
resultsA total of 252 patients responded (response rate 12%). Only 6.4% agreed that their general practice has a key role in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and 5.0% felt their general practices should take greater action. Most (82.0%) disagreed that the government should do more to incentivise practice-level decarbonisation. Few respondents felt well informed about climate change (14.0%) or its health impacts (1%). Awareness of practice-level actions such as electronic communication and medicine-return schemes was moderate, but these were rarely recognised as decarbonisation measures. Around one in four reported willingness to engage in a medication review or increase active travel if suggested by practice staff. Concerns that environmental actions might compromise the quality of their care were common (72%).
conclusionsDecarbonisation is not currently a core expectation that patients hold for general practice. Limited awareness and engagement highlight the need to frame sustainability as supporting, rather than competing with, care quality. Embedding decarbonisation within routine service improvement may be more acceptable than positioning it as a separate priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.