ArticleBMC oral health2026
Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting prolonged ICU length of stay after oral free flap reconstruction without prophylactic tracheostomy.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a nomogram for predicting prolonged ICU length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing oral free flap reconstruction without prophylactic tracheostomy.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 419 consecutive patients treated between January 2019 and July 2025. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 294) and a validation set (n = 125) at a 7:3 ratio. LASSO regression was used for variable selection in the training set, followed by multivariable logistic regression to build the prediction model, which was visualized as a nomogram. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsSeven predictive factors were ultimately included in the model: primary site (Location), flap source, smoking history, intraoperative blood loss (per 10 mL increment), postoperative blood glucose, postoperative procalcitonin (PCT), and the International Normalized Ratio (INR). The AUC was 0.722 (95% CI: 0.652-0.793) in the training set and 0.769 (95% CI: 0.667-0.872) in the validation set. The model demonstrated good calibration and significant net clinical benefit.
conclusionThe developed nomogram model shows good discrimination and calibration. Based on routine perioperative indicators, it can be used for rapid bedside identification of high-risk patients, providing a quantitative basis for ICU resource allocation and individualized enhanced recovery pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.