Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243821›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Beyond the price tag: a scoping review of the determinants of informal payments in health systems and strategies for curbing them.

Faride Sadat Jalali, Najmeh Bordbar, Mohadeseh Ghanbari-Jahromi, Mohsen Bayati

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faride Sadat JalaliHealth Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Najmeh BordbarHealth Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. nabordbar@gmail.com.
Mohadeseh Ghanbari-JahromiResearch Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Mohsen BayatiHealth Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformal payments (IPs) remain a persistent challenge across health systems worldwide and may undermine equity, transparency, and public trust in healthcare delivery. Despite a growing body of research, evidence regarding the determinants of IPs and the strategies proposed to address them remains fragmented and lacks a comprehensive synthesis. This scoping review aimed to: (1) map and synthesize existing evidence on the key determinants of IPs in health systems globally; and (2) identify, categorize, and summarize the range of strategies proposed to curb them.

methodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, we conducted a systematic search across five databases-PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect-from database inception through January 2025. Two reviewers independently screened all records against predefined eligibility criteria. Data from the included studies were extracted using a standardized form and thematically analyzed.

resultsThis review synthesized evidence from 68 studies. Determinants of IPs were categorized into five interconnected levels: (1) patient-level factors (e.g., fear of poor-quality care, desire for faster services, and limited knowledge); (2) structural/contextual factors (e.g., underfunding, weak regulation, and type of service); (3) provider-level factors (e.g., low salaries and shortages of supplies); (4) cultural/ethical factors (e.g., norms of gratitude and social acceptance of informal payments); and (5) organizational-level factors (e.g., corruption and lack of accountability). Proposed interventions were grouped into five strategic categories: patient empowerment (education and patient-rights mechanisms); cultural-normative strategies (shifting social norms and fostering trust); financial strategies (improving provider remuneration, formalizing payments, and expanding insurance coverage); structural strategies (strengthening health systems and improving service accessibility); and governance and regulatory strategies (legal frameworks, oversight mechanisms, and sanctions). An analytical framework was developed to illustrate the mechanisms of action and key contextual considerations associated with each strategy, highlighting that implementation processes and outcomes are highly context dependent.

conclusionsIPs are a multifactorial phenomenon rooted in systemic weaknesses, economic incentives, and sociocultural norms. Isolated interventions are unlikely to be effective. Addressing IPs requires integrated, multi-pronged strategies that reduce financial pressures on providers, strengthen governance and transparency, improve service quality and accessibility, empower patients, and reshape cultural norms. This review provides a foundational evidence map to support the design of context-sensitive, system-level policies aimed at reducing and ultimately eliminating informal payments. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of interventions across diverse health system contexts, particularly in underrepresented settings, and further examine the institutional and contextual factors that perpetuate informal payment practices. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFinancing, PersonalHealth ExpendituresHumansHealth expendituresHealth policyInformal paymentsReviewUnder-the-table

Identifiers

PMID42243821
PMCPMC13463993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.