ArticleBMC medical education2026
ISP25: health crisis management training for public health residents in France, a pilot and feasibility study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPublic health residents play a critical role in crisis management but operate under administrative and population-level constraints that differ fundamentally from traditional clinical "bedside" Crisis Resource Management (CRM). There is a need to adapt existing training models to this specific institutional context.
objectiveThis study aims to (i) describe a simulation-based training model specifically adapted to the French administrative context for public health residents; (ii) assess the feasibility and acceptability of this pilot program; and (iii) provide a translation and cultural adaptation of two assessment tools (the Ottawa CRM Global Rating Scale and the Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool [SET-M]) for the Francophone community.
methodsWe conducted a prospective pilot feasibility study with a convenience sample of six public health residents (n = 6) in the Île-de-France region. The intervention combined a theoretical session on French health administration with a high-fidelity simulation exercise involving role-play in a crisis room. We collected descriptive data on participant satisfaction and self-reported skill progression using the French-adapted questionnaires.
resultsParticipants reported high satisfaction and strong acceptance of the training format, with all residents agreeing on the utility of the prebriefing and debriefing components. Descriptive analysis of individual trajectories showed positive trends in self-assessed leadership and communication skills. Conversely, a stagnation or decrease in problem-solving scores for some participants suggested a pedagogical "recalibration" of self-efficacy (potential mitigation of the Dunning-Kruger effect) following the immersive simulation.
conclusionThis pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and high acceptability of adapting CRM training for public health residents acting in administrative capacities. It provides the first French-adapted assessment tools for this specific population. Due to the limited sample size, future research with larger cohorts and controlled designs is necessary to formally evaluate the effectiveness of this training model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.