ReviewHarm reduction journal2026
"Chill packs" self-administered olanzapine as psychiatric harm reduction for methamphetamine-induced psychosis: a narrative review of the existing evidence base.
Review in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of methamphetamine use disorder has risen across the United States and many other countries, which has led to a concomitant rise in methamphetamine-induced psychosis (MIP). A promising and novel approach to address MIP can be found in 'chill packs', a psychiatric harm reduction intervention for people using methamphetamine. Chill packs consist of several low-dose olanzapine tablets (an antipsychotic medication) that can be self-administered in the event of methamphetamine-induced insomnia, anxiety, paranoia, delusions, or other dysphoric symptoms. One recent study assessed the effectiveness of an implementation of chill packs by the San Francisco Department of Health and found that repeat psychiatric emergency visits dropped by 32% after two-months and 13% after six-months from receipt of a chill pack. While these findings are promising, more research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and generalizability of this intervention. Here we provide a narrative review which synthesizes indirect evidence and contextual information relevant to this intervention, including: the epidemiology of MIP, clinical data supporting the use of olanzapine versus other antipsychotics for MIP, evidence for as-needed outpatient antipsychotic use, as well as qualitative and other data describing the potential for misuse of olanzapine and other antipsychotics. Overall, the literature supports that the prevalence of MIP is rising sharply, causing increased psychiatric burden. This is also linked to overdose risk among patients that use illicit fentanyl or other sedatives to "come down" after periods of heavy methamphetamine use. Olanzapine has demonstrated comparable efficacy for treating MIP compared to other antipsychotics with enhanced short-term sedative effects, despite a higher burden of long-term metabolic side effects. Olanzapine has very little documented misuse risk, although other agents in its class, especially quetiapine, have higher street value. Qualitative research highlights that some groups already self-administer olanzapine as a 'trip killer' to manage distressing psychiatric side effects from illicit drug use. Overall, we find substantial contextual evidence supporting further trials to evaluate chill packs as a harm-reduction intervention for MIP and provide recommendations for research needed to fill gaps in the evidence for this promising emerging intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.