ArticleBMC oral health2026
Non-invasive periodontal screening using self-reported-oral-health (SROH) questionnaire and salivary biomarkers: development and validation of machine learning models.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate and accessible screening tools for periodontitis are essential for early detection and disease prevention. This study evaluated a non-invasive diagnostic approach integrating sociodemographic data, self-reported oral health (SROH) questionnaires, and salivary biomarkers, using both conventional statistical and machine learning (ML) predictive models.
methodsSeventy-seven adults completed a validated SROH questionnaire and provided saliva samples for quantification of six biomarkers: interleukins (IL-1β, IL-6), tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-8, MMP-9), and metallothionein (MT). Participants were clinically classified as having (i) periodontal health, (ii) gingivitis, or (iii) periodontitis. Predictive models were developed using Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Naive Bayes (NB) across three feature sets: (i) SROH, salivary biomarkers and sociodemographic, (ii) SROH and salivary biomarkers, (iii) SROH and sociodemographic and (v) SROH alone. Model performance was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation and standard evaluation metrics.
resultsThe RF model trained on SROH, and salivary biomarkers achieved the highest accuracy with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.856), with superior precision (70.13%), sensitivity (0.701) and lower error rates (RMSE = 0.371) compared with NB (AUC = 0.795) and LR (AUC = 0.724) models in detecting periodontitis.
conclusionsThis non-invasive, SROH and biomarker-integrated approach shows potential as a first-line screening and referral tool in primary care and population-based settings where comprehensive periodontal examination is not routinely available. Further validation in larger, more diverse populations is warranted to support clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.