Trial reportBMC palliative care2026
Acceptability and feasibility of a Patient Support Coordinator (PSC) model to facilitate serious illness communication in outpatient oncology.
Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07428655 (Pilot Study to Evaluate the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness of a Patient Support Coordinator), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness of a Patient Support Coordinator (PSC)-Facilitated Model of Serious Illness Communication
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConventional serious illness conversations (SICs) are frequently impeded by clinical time constraints and a lack of psychological readiness among patients. To address these barriers, this study evaluates the acceptability and feasibility of a novel Patient Support Coordinator (PSC)-delivered intervention that nests values and goals exploration within a non-directive supportive listening intervention facilitated by a non-clinician. Conceptualized as a preparatory adjunct to clinician-delivered SICs, this approach facilitates the open-ended exploration of patient-defined interests and concerns at a pace that respects individual preferences and coping strategies.
methodsThis single-arm, non-randomized pilot study used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design in outpatient oncology. Acceptability was assessed through Feeling Heard and Understood (FHU) and Client Satisfaction (CSQ) surveys with a predefined threshold ≥ 12/16. Qualitative interviews with patients (n = 21) and oncologists (n = 2) provided data on intervention acceptability and implementation feasibility.
resultsEnrollment (90.3%) and retention (85.7%) rates surpassed feasibility targets. High acceptability was demonstrated by median scores of 13/16 for the FHU (n = 19) and 15/16 for the CSQ (n = 20). While most participants met the FHU threshold, four scored below 12 due to gendered discomfort, mismatched expectations, and perceptions that they were coping well and had no need of supportive listening. Qualitatively, the PSC was described as having provided a safe emotional outlet and humanized care by addressing psychosocial needs that participants felt their treating oncologists had no room to manage. The coordinator's status as a non-clinician and capacity to demonstrate sensitivity and care were found to facilitate rapport-building, thereby enabling meaning-making and biographical reflection. Clinicians reported minimal workflow disruption and valued the PSC's ability to surface patient concerns and treatment misconceptions that often remain unvoiced in routine clinic consultations.
conclusionsNesting values-based exploration within supportive listening is a feasible and acceptable framework for oncology care. By providing a non-clinical space for reflection, the PSC model may address common barriers to SIC initiation, enhance the patient care experience, and thus serve as an adjunct to support clinicians in SIC initiation. Future research should evaluate the model's scalability and its comparative utility against conventional clinician-led models.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07428655, retrospectively registered on 23 February 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.