ReviewBMC nephrology2026
Atatürk's kidney disease: pyelonephritis or trench nephritis? A medical and historical analysis.
Review in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to examine Atatürk's recurrent renal disease throughout his life in light of historical and medical evidence and to evaluate, from a medical history perspective, whether this condition is more consistent with pyelonephritis or with "trench nephritis," as described among soldiers during World War I.
methodsThis study was designed as a qualitative narrative review using document and content analysis. Primary and secondary sources obtained from the Archives of the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, the National Library, newspaper archives, physicians' reports, memoirs, and scholarly works were systematically examined. The data were classified chronologically, and symptoms, diagnoses, treatments, medical recommendations, and treatment centers were analyzed thematically within a comparative clinical framework.
resultsThe findings indicate that between 1909 and 1923, Atatürk' experienced recurrent episodes of renal pain, fever, fatigue, and urinary inflammation. The periods of the 1911 Italo-Turkish (Trablusgarb) War, the 1915 Gallipoli (Çanakkale) Campaign, and the 1918 Vienna-Karlsbad treatments are particularly notable. The therapies applied (rest, hot baths, hydrotherapy, dietary regulation, and spa cures) were consistent with contemporary medical practice in that era. The clinical presentation shows overlapping features compatible with both chronic pyelonephritis and trench nephritis.
conclusionDue to the analytical limitations of historical data, a definitive diagnosis of Atatürk's renal disease cannot be established. Nevertheless, it is likely that both trench nephritis like episodes triggered by wartime conditions and a recurrent pyelonephritis process beginning at a young age contributed to his clinical course. Despite significant health challenges, Atatürk's uninterrupted continuation of military and political leadership stands as a striking testament to his personal resilience and strong sense of duty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.