Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243743›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Artificial intelligence in the detection of dental pulp calcifications: a scoping review.

Arham M Alkherbash, Mohammed Alsabri, Naibah Rajeh, Al-Baraa Al-Samawi, Omar Al-Fakih, Maria Alwarafy

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arham M AlkherbashDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Mohammed AlsabriDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen. Mohamed.Alsabri@su.edu.ye.
Naibah RajehDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Al-Baraa Al-SamawiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Omar Al-FakihDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Maria AlwarafyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental pulp calcifications, including pulp stones and diffuse calcific changes, can complicate endodontic access, canal negotiation, and treatment planning. Artificial intelligence may support radiographic detection of these findings, but the available evidence remains limited and methodologically heterogeneous. This scoping review mapped peer-reviewed studies that applied artificial intelligence to detect, classify, or segment dental pulp calcifications on two-dimensional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.

methodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language studies published from 1 January 2015 to 29 September 2025. After duplicate and ineligible records were removed, 450 records underwent title and abstract screening, 32 full-text reports were assessed, and seven peer-reviewed studies were included. Data were charted descriptively according to imaging modality, artificial intelligence architecture, task type, validation design, annotation approach, and reported performance. Owing to heterogeneity in tasks, datasets, and outcome metrics, no meta-analysis or inferential statistical testing was performed.

resultsThe included studies were retrospective, single-centre investigations published between 2023 and 2025. Two-dimensional radiographic studies using detection or classification pipelines reported high internal performance, with accuracy ranging from 95.4% to 96.5% and F1 scores ranging from 78.9% to 96.6%. One panoramic segmentation study reported Dice scores of 0.84 for pulp and 0.759 for pulp stones. In cone-beam computed tomography, one three-dimensional U-Net study reported accuracy of 72.8% and an area under the curve of 0.74, with reduced sensitivity for micro or diffuse calcifications. No study used external validation, and public code or datasets were generally unavailable.

conclusionsArtificial intelligence methods show technical potential for detecting dental pulp calcifications, particularly in internally validated two-dimensional radiographic studies. However, the evidence is still preliminary. Clinical translation is limited by single-centre designs, small and heterogeneous datasets, lack of external validation, inconsistent reporting, and limited reproducibility. Future research should prioritize multicentre datasets, lesion-size stratification, standardized reporting, open benchmarking, calibration assessment, and prospective workflow-based evaluation.

trial registrationNot applicable. This study was a scoping review and did not involve a clinical trial.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDental Pulp CalcificationCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental PulpHumansArtificial intelligenceCone-beam computed tomographyDeep learningDental pulp calcificationEndodonticsPanoramic radiographyPulp stonesScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42243743
PMCPMC13504996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.