Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2026
Temporal trends, antimicrobial non-susceptibility patterns, and clinical predictors of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a tertiary care hospital in Palestine: a 7-year retrospective study.
Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen of increasing clinical importance because of its intrinsic resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents and its growing presence in healthcare environments. However, data describing its epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Palestine remain limited. This study examined temporal trends, distribution across specimen types and care settings, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of S. maltophilia isolates.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital between 2018 and 2024. Unique clinical isolates of S. maltophilia were identified using the VITEK
resultsA total of 177 unique S. maltophilia isolates were identified, corresponding to a prevalence of 1.08% among all cultures performed. Annual prevalence fluctuated during the study period without evidence of a sustained linear trend. Respiratory specimens accounted for the largest proportion of isolates, and more than one-third originated from intensive care unit (ICU)-related settings. Susceptibility remained highest for cotrimoxazole (80.2%) and levofloxacin (78.5%), whereas ceftazidime showed lower historical non-susceptibility rates (42.9%). Paired analyses demonstrated significantly higher non-susceptibility to ceftazidime than to cotrimoxazole or levofloxacin (p < 0.001). Combined non-susceptibility (non-susceptibility to all three tested agents; CNP) occurred in 5.6% of isolates and was significantly more frequent among ICU-related isolates (21.7% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analyses, prior antibiotic exposure (p = 0.044) and COVID-19 infection (p = 0.027) were independently associated with levofloxacin non-susceptibility, whereas invasive medical device use was associated with ceftazidime non-susceptibility (p = 0.004).
conclusionsS. maltophilia isolates demonstrated heterogeneous antimicrobial non-susceptibility patterns, with preserved susceptibility to cotrimoxazole and levofloxacin but reduced activity of ceftazidime. The higher frequency of the combined non-susceptibility phenotype (CNP) among ICU-related isolates suggests that critical care settings may serve as reservoirs for more resistant phenotypes. Continued microbiological surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship are essential to guide empiric therapy and infection-control strategies. CLINICAL
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.