ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Process, outcomes and feasibility of implementing universal newborn screening programme in Sri Lanka.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe universal newborn screening detects clinically occult but potentially serious conditions, enabling timely treatment to reduce child morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organisation recommends incorporating universal newborn screening into routine newborn care. In early 2025, Sri Lanka launched a universal newborn screening package including screening for eye abnormalities, congenital hypothyroidism, critical congenital heart diseases and hearing impairment in five pilot hospitals. Here, we aim to describe the process, outcomes, and technical and operational feasibility of implementing the universal newborn screening package in Sri Lanka.
methodsA descriptive study was conducted in five hospitals that piloted the universal newborn screening package in Sri Lanka from January to March 2025. All neonates born during the study period were recruited. Data on the screening process were obtained from maternal interviews and patient records. Telephone interviews were done 4-6 weeks post-discharge to capture screening outcomes. Neonates who had abnormal results of the screening tests were identified as 'Refer' for the test.
resultsA total of 3860 newborns (males-51.0%) were recruited. Eye screening was performed in > 99% of neonates, with 76 (1.9%) being 'Refer' predominantly (74/76) due to the presence of risk factors. The screening rate for congenital hypothyroidism was 99.8%, which detected six (0.15%) with congenital hypothyroidism. Pulse oximetry screening was performed in 98.5%, of which eight (0.2%) were 'Refer' and one subsequently confirmed to have a critical congenital heart disease. Overall, 79.1% of neonates underwent hearing screening, of which 325 (10.6%) were 'Refer' in the first test, and 20 were 'Refer' in the second test and referred for further evaluation.
conclusionsThe pilot implementation of the Universal Newborn Screening package in Sri Lanka demonstrated high coverage exceeding 98% for screening of congenital hypothyroidism, critical congenital heart disease, and eye abnormalities, highlighting operational feasibility. In contrast, screening for hearing impairment remained suboptimal, largely attributable to logistical and system-level challenges. The congenital hypothyroidism screening detected six (0.15%) cases, and pulse oximetry screening detected one with a critical congenital heart disease. These findings suggest that universal newborn screening is a feasible and potentially sustainable intervention that can be effectively integrated into the existing health system in Sri Lanka.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.