Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243703›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Carbon ion radiotherapy for unresectable primary or recurrent soft tissue sarcomas: long-term outcomes based on the local effect model.

Ping Li, Yongqiang Li, Cihang Bao, Xin Cai, Zheng Wang, Qing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ping Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Yongqiang Li *Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China.
Cihang BaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Xin CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China. qing.zhang@sphic.org.cn.

Funding

Pudong New Area Science and Technology Development Foundation PKJ2023-Y42Scientific Research Program of Shanghai Pudong New Area Health Commission PW2021A-41Scientific Research Program of Shanghai Pudong New Area Health Commission PW2024A-40Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau 20224Y0273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for unresectable primary or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains controversial and existing data are limited. We herein present our institutional experience with CIRT for unresectable primary or recurrent STS.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of CIRT in unresectable primary or recurrent STS patients at our center. We assessed the 4-and 5-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression free survival (PFS), as well as acute and late toxicities. Additionally, we analyzed the prognostic factors associated with the treatment outcomes.

resultsBetween June 2015 and August 2022, 48 consecutive patients with unresectable primary (n = 8, 16.7%) or recurrent (n = 40, 83.3%) STS were treated with CIRT. The most common tumor sites were the retroperitoneum and pelvis (75.0%). The predominant histological subtypes included liposarcoma (20.8%), leiomyosarcoma (10.4%), synovial sarcoma (8.3%) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (8.3%). Nine patients (18.8%) had a history of prior in-field radiotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 48.6 months. The 4-year LC, OS, DMFS, and PFS rates were 65.8%, 59.7%, 50.3%, and 36.7%, respectively. The 5-year LC, OS, DMFS, and PFS rates were 60.3%, 54.7%, 44.0%, and 28.0%, respectively. The median survival time was 67.3 months. Late toxicities included grade 3 dermatitis (n = 2, 4.2%), grade 3 decreased joint range of motion (n = 1, 2.1%), and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy (n = 1, 2.1%). Patients who received a higher prescribed dose (biologically effective dose, BED ≥ 129 Gy) exhibited significantly better LC (p = 0.010) and PFS (p = 0.004) compared to those who received a lower prescribed dose. A pre-CIRT neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3 was significantly associated with inferior DMFS (p = 0.020).

conclusionsFor select patients with unresectable primary or recurrent STS, CIRT represents a potentially effective and well-tolerated treatment option, though it requires careful evaluation of neural risks-particularly for lesions adjacent to critical nerve structures.

Indexed as

Heavy Ion RadiotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSarcomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCarbon Ion RadiotherapyLocal Effect ModelNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioSoft tissue sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID42243703
PMCPMC13455471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.