Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243665›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2026

Characterization of four highly efficient ammonifying bacteria from Camellia Oleifera and their effects on soil chemical properties.

Xiaoxiao Zhou, Kai Wang, Ziqiong Luo, Junqin Zhou, Jun Yuan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoxiao ZhouState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
Kai WangState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
Ziqiong LuoState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
Junqin ZhouState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
Jun YuanState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China. yuanjun@csuft.edu.cn.

Funding

Forestry Industry Development Project of Hunan Provincial Forestry Bureau 2025YCCY003National Natural Science Foundation of China 32471916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCamellia oleifera is an ammonium-preferring woody oil crop. However, cultivable ammonifying bacteria from its rhizosphere remain insufficiently characterized, and their potential to improve soil chemical properties and enhance nitrogen availability has not yet been evaluated.

resultsA total of 160 cultivable bacterial isolates were obtained from rhizosphere soil. Among them, 25 isolates showed positive ammonia production in preliminary screening. Quantitative determination revealed significant differences in ammonium production, ranging from 1.016 to 14.753 mg mL

conclusionsFour efficient ammonifying bacteria isolated from the C. oleifera rhizosphere exhibited strong ammonium-producing capacity, compatibility for consortium formulation, and improved soil nitrogen supply and chemical properties.

Indexed as

AmmoniaBacteriaCamelliaSoilSoil MicrobiologyAmmonium CompoundsDNA, BacterialNitrogenPhylogenyRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmmoniaAmmonium CompoundsDNA, BacterialNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilAmmonifying bacteriaAmmoniumCamellia oleiferaMicrobial inoculantNitrogen cyclingRhizosphere

Identifiers

PMID42243665
PMCPMC13455317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.