ArticleGenes & nutrition2026
A flexible synthetic diet platform for Drosophila nutrigenomics.
Article in Genes & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNutrient-gene interactions are key determinants of metabolic disease phenotypes, but systematic analysis remains constrained by the labour required to generate precisely defined diets. To address this, we developed a flexible method for assembling synthetic diets for Drosophila melanogaster from individual stock solutions, enabling rapid and controlled modification of dietary composition.
resultsUsing this approach, we generated a rational array of 51 diets in which single nutrients were varied systematically. We first showed that diets prepared using the flexible method performed comparably to standard preparation methods in wild-type flies, with similar developmental timing, survival, adult body weight, and starvation resistance. As a proof-of-concept, we then applied this dietary array to a Drosophila model of isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency, a severe metabolic disorder caused by defective sulfur amino acid catabolism. This validated previously identified nutrient-specific effects, including survival and pupariation rescue by cysteine depletion, while also revealing additional amino acid-modified diets that improved pupal survival.
conclusionsThis platform provides a scalable and versatile in vivo framework for systematically interrogating genotype-specific nutritional responses in Drosophila. It should facilitate the identification of diet-gene interactions relevant to metabolic disease and support broader nutritional screening across disease models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.