ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Role of the gut microbiota-bile acid axis in liver fibrosis based on microbiomics and targeted metabolomics.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective diagnoses and treatments for liver fibrosis (LF) are lacking. The gut microbiota (GM)-bile acid (BA) axis is critically associated with LF development and may represent a potential target for delaying or reversing LF.
methodsWe combined fecal microbiomics and BA-targeted metabolomics to characterize the GM-BA axis in rats with carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)-induced LF and used fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and probiotics (Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablet solution) to regulate the GM-BA axis to investigate the role of the GM-BA axis in LF and its related mechanisms.
resultsThe GM composition and GM β-diversity differed significantly between the control and model rats. Clostridia and others were significantly increased, whereas Bifidobacteriales and others were significantly decreased in model rats. Serum BA metabolism differed significantly between the groups. The concentrations of 19 BAs were significantly increased in model rats. FMT improved the disordered GM by increasing Bifidobacteriales and others and decreasing Clostridia and others. Probiotics improved the disordered GM by decreasing Clostridia, Lachnospiracea_incertae_sedis and others. FMT and probiotics improved BA metabolism by decreasing BAs such as tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA). FMT and probiotics were associated with a reduced degree of LF in model rats.
conclusionsThe GM-BA axis is strongly associated with LF, and the use of FMT and probiotics may contribute to regulating the GM-BA axis and to alleviating LF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.