Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243617›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2026

Real-World Evidence for Drug Value Assessment in China: Learning from International Experiences.

Abraham G Hartzema, Adel Gehchan, Jennifer D Guo, Jianwei Xuan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abraham G HartzemaCollege of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. hartzema@ufl.edu.
Adel Gehchan3ARx Solutions, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer D Guo3ARx Solutions, LLC, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2230-7384
Jianwei XuanSchool of Pharmacy, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In China, the national medical insurance system has undergone rapid development over the past two decades. The National Healthcare Security Administration was established to manage the growing healthcare expenditure. Since then, this administration has maintained the drug formulary, known as the National Reimbursement Drug List. The list comprises Category A (essential and cost-effective drugs) and Category B (effective drugs with relatively higher cost profiles), with the Commercial Insurance Innovative Drug list (referred to as Category C) added in 2025. China has made progress in adopting real-world evidence into healthcare decision making. Real-world evidence helps address key uncertainties related to safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes to complement clinical trial findings using real-world data from routine clinical practice. Evolving international experiences provide practical insights into the use of real-world evidence to support drug reimbursement and reassessment decisions. This paper proposes practical strategies supporting the integration of real-world evidence into China's drug value assessment to better inform national formulary management and reimbursement pathways.

Identifiers

PMID42243617
PMCPMC13287191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.