Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243602›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Simulating object recognition with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) model.

Sergio N Galarce, Edgar H Vogel, Benjamin Keep, Jasper Robinson, Charlotte Bonardi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio N GalarceResearch Center on Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Talca, Talca, Chile.
Edgar H VogelResearch Center on Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Talca, Talca, Chile.
Benjamin KeepSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Jasper RobinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Charlotte BonardiSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Charlotte.Bonardi@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

Programa de Investigación Asociativa en Ciencias Cognitivas, Universidad de Talca RU-158-2019Royal Society IES\R1\231273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object recognition is the ability to discriminate previously encountered objects from novel ones, typically inferred from exploratory preferences. It is usually treated as a form of recognition memory. A central idea is that both nonassociative and associative processes contribute, organized around priming: a stimulus is processed less, and therefore explored less, when its representation is already primed at the moment of encounter. Priming can arise from the stimulus's own recent activation (self-priming) or from associative cueing by context or other stimuli (associative priming). Allan Wagner's Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) model provides a quantitative framework for these two components, yet prior evaluations of this model have remained qualitative. Here, we specify a numerical implementation of SOP for the principal object-recognition procedures and their key manipulations (retention and interstimulus intervals, and spatial displacement). We then simulate three widely replicated experiments: spontaneous object recognition, relative recency, and object-in-place. The model quantitatively captures the canonical preferences (novel > familiar, remote > recent, displaced > nondisplaced) and aligns with the core features of recent datasets. Beyond fitting existing results, SOP has substantial heuristic value. Our analysis points to concrete future experiments that manipulate object locations, interstimulus spacing, distractor load, and arousal to dissociate associative from nonassociative influences.

Indexed as

Association LearningModels, PsychologicalRecognition, PsychologyHumansAnimal and human associative learningComputational modelingRecognition memory

Identifiers

PMID42243602
PMCPMC13236758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.