ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Pop-out or emotional blink? Differentiating two phases of emotional capture in temporal attention.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the emotional attentional blink (EAB; also termed emotion-induced blindness/EIB), a target in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of fillers is difficult to report when it is preceded by a task-irrelevant emotional distractor. This is typically interpreted as capture of temporal attention by emotion. However, recent research has pointed out that many EAB tasks use emotional distractors that are visually distinct from other task stimuli, and that controlling for visual distinctiveness attenuates the EAB. This suggests that emotion alone is not a strong driver of the initial attentional capture in the EAB. The current study thus asked if this "emotional" blink is best understood as a salience-driven pop-out initiated by visual salience that is subsequently modulated by emotion. Using RSVP of images with unusually dense temporal sampling and factorial manipulations of critical distractor emotion and visual salience, the results support this account, and further suggest that the EAB can be characterized as two phases. Specifically, Phase 1 reflects visual salience, evidenced by an immediate but rapidly attenuating blink elicited by low emotion + high visual salience distractors. Phase 2 reflects emotional modulation, evidenced by a longer-latency and weaker blink elicited by high emotion + low visual salience distractors. High emotion + high visual salience distractors highlighted both phases: an immediate blink, presumably from visual salience, that continued into later lags. These results yield a mechanistic understanding of how emotion and visual salience interact to drive visual attention in rapidly-changing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42243599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.