ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Describing the growth pattern of domestic geese (Anser anser) using nonlinear models.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the growth trajectory of domestic geese (Anser anser) by fitting six classical nonlinear growth models (Brody, Bridges, Janoschek, Richards, Schumacher, and Morgan) and one alternative sinusoidal function to body weight data and comparing their performance. Models were fitted using nonlinear regression, and their adequacy was evaluated based on adjusted R², root mean square error (RMSE), Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The dataset comprised body weight records from hatch to 63 days of age. All models showed good agreement with observed data (adjusted R² of 0.9812 to 0.9996, 0.9781 to 0.994, and 0.9800 to 0.9996 for males, females, and all geese, respectively). However, the sinusoidal model consistently provided the best fit, yielding the lowest RMSE (27.88 to 30.74), AIC (92.48 to 94.43), and BIC (70.66 to 72.61) values compared with alternative models such as Brody (RMSE = 183.00 to 195.60, AIC = 129.65 to 130.98, BIC = 107.53 to 108.87). Durbin-Watson (DW) values varied from 0.98 (Brody) to 2.66 (sinusoidal) for males, 0.94 (Brody) to 2.90 (sinusoidal) for females, and 0.95 (Brody) to 2.86 (sinusoidal) for the pooled dataset. Across sexes and the pooled dataset, the sinusoidal function demonstrated superior predictive accuracy and model efficiency. These results indicate that the sinusoidal model offers a flexible and precise approach for describing goose growth dynamics and may serve as a robust alternative to conventional nonlinear growth models in poultry science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42243579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.