ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026
Pediatric oral cavity physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict pharmacokinetics of mucoadhesive atropine gel to treat sialorrhea.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sialorrhea significantly impairs quality of life in children with neurodisabilities, including cerebral palsy, yet safe and effective pharmacologic treatment options remain limited. Although atropine is widely used for sialorrhea, it is most commonly used off-label as ophthalmic drops administered intraorally, an approach constrained by poor mucosal retention, frequent dosing, medication-error risk, and systemic anticholinergic adverse effects. To address these limitations, we developed a novel mucoadhesive atropine oral gel (0.01% weight/weight (w/w)) to enhance intraoral residence time and support controlled local and systemic exposure. The pharmacokinetics and safety of the atropine gel were evaluated in a Phase I clinical trial in healthy adults, which informed the development and validation of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model incorporating a mechanistic oral cavity framework. The oral cavity PBPK model accounts for salivary flow, mucosal absorption, swallowing, and saliva-tissue exchange across six compartments, enabling predictions of local and systemic exposure and evaluation of formulation-relevant determinants of intraoral absorption. Pediatric PBPK simulations were scaled from the adult model using Population Estimates for Age-Related Physiology™ (PEAR Physiology™) to support model-informed dose selection. Simulations identified a minimum pediatric dose range of 0.25 mg/kg once or twice daily, with twice-daily dosing to maintain plasma concentrations within the established minimum effective and maximum tolerated concentration range. Collectively, this work demonstrates the utility of PBPK modeling as a translational tool to integrate formulation attributes, oral cavity physiology, and pediatric dose selection, and supports the clinical advancement of mucoadhesive atropine gel as a safer alternative to off-label intraoral atropine eye drops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42243578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.