ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Antibody-Drug Conjugates Drug Product Formulation and Process Development, Scalability and Stability Considerations.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Linker Design in Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Balancing Stability and Drug Release.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the target specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of cytotoxic small molecules, offering enhanced therapeutic potential. However, their inherent structural complexity, arising from the interplay of antibody, linker, and payload, introduces unique challenges for drug product (DP) development, stability, and scalability requiring tailored approaches to maintain the quality target product profile throughout the product lifecycle. This review summarizes key formulation and process development considerations for ADCs, with an emphasis on aspects that are particularly distinctive for ADC drug products. Critical degradation risks, such as photo- and heat-induced degradation, are discussed in the context of formulation screening, formulation excipients and primary packaging selection, and DP process design. Basic considerations on analytical tools used to identify and monitor critical quality attributes are provided. Lyophilization strategies, essential for the stability of commercialized ADCs, are recommended using Design of Experiments and modeling approaches. Furthermore, robust DP process control strategies during scale-up are reviewed with a focus on lyophilization, the application of Quality by Design (QbD) principles, and risk-based methodologies to address ADC‑specific challenges. Finally, the review explores the transition from early development to late-phase clinical and commercial stages, underscoring the need for evolving control strategies. Overall, it provides an overview of current practices and challenges in ADC formulation and DP process development, offering strategies to navigate these complexities based on literature and insights from approved ADCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42243572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.