ReviewDrugs2026
Classic Psychedelics for Chronic Pain: A Critical Review of the Literature and Practical Advice for Clinicians.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psilocybin-Assisted Early Palliative Care for Demoralization and Chronic Pain: An Open-Label Pilot Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain is common, costly, and for many, remains inadequately treated by existing pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches. In parallel with growing dissatisfaction with conventional therapies, classic serotonergic psychedelics, such as psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), ayahuasca, N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), and mescaline, administered alone or within psychedelic-assisted therapy models, have re-emerged as potential therapeutic tools for a range of health conditions, including chronic pain. In this review, we examine putative mechanisms of action relevant to pain, including effects on neuroplasticity, inflammation, large-scale brain network dynamics, and higher-order psychological processes, such as pain acceptance and cognitive flexibility. We also briefly overview findings from relevant preclinical models for pain. We then summarize recent observational studies and early-phase clinical trials that highlight preliminary signals of benefit across multiple pain conditions, including fibromyalgia, migraine, cluster headache, and other chronic pain syndromes. In addition, we critically evaluate safety considerations, contraindications, drug-drug interactions, and key regulatory challenges that will shape both research and clinical implementation of psychedelics for chronic pain. Finally, we offer pragmatic guidance for clinicians to work more skillfully with patients choosing to use these substances on their own. Although the existing literature suggests mechanistic plausibility and promising preliminary outcomes, the field is limited by small sample sizes, functional unblinding, and a lack of large, well-controlled randomized trials. We conclude by outlining critical methodological priorities and future research directions needed to rigorously evaluate the potential role of psychedelic compounds in the treatment of chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.