Observational studyClinical oral investigations2026
Endodontic-sinus communications: a 10-year retrospective observational study on maxillary posterior teeth.
Observational study in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the clinical characteristics, anatomical distribution, and long-term outcomes of unintended endodontic-sinus communication involving maxillary posterior teeth that occurred during endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective observational study reviewed clinical records collected over approximately 10 years of routine clinical practice. Among 10,345 maxillary premolars and molars treated endodontically, cases presenting intraoperative endodontic-sinus communication were identified. Preoperative periapical radiographs were obtained in all cases, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) available in selected patients. Endodontic treatment was performed under rubber dam isolation using electronic apex locators and rotary nickel-titanium instruments. The Valsalva maneuver was systematically performed intraoperatively to detect communication. Root canal obturation was completed in one or two visits using bioceramic techniques. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was scheduled at 3, 5, and 10 years.
resultsThirty-one patients (18 males, 13 females) presented an endodontic-sinus communication, corresponding to an incidence of 0.30% (31/10,345). The affected teeth included 14 maxillary second molars, 15 maxillary first molars, and 2 maxillary second premolars. A total of 32 root-level communications were identified. Vital primary treatments accounted for 22 cases (70.97%), retreatments for 7 cases (22.58%), and necrotic teeth for 2 cases (6.45%). The Valsalva maneuver was positive in all cases. The mean follow-up duration was 48 months (range: 36-120 months). All evaluated teeth remained functional, with no persistent sinus-related symptoms and no need for surgical intervention.
conclusionsUnintended endodontic-sinus communication is a rare intraoperative event during treatment of maxillary posterior teeth. Early recognition, strict apical control, and conservative management may allow favorable long-term outcomes without the need for surgical intervention. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously in light of the retrospective design, limited sample size, and absence of a control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.