ArticleJournal of human genetics2026
Neonatal cytogenetic validation demonstrates high accuracy of single-nucleotide polymorphism-based non-invasive prenatal testing: a 4466-case single-center study.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used for fetal aneuploidy screening; however, most evaluations of test accuracy rely on pregnancy outcomes rather than cytogenetic confirmation after birth, and evidence regarding the real-world performance of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPT remains limited. We analyzed prospectively collected clinical data from pregnant women at high risk of fetal aneuploidy who underwent SNP-based NIPT between 2013 and 2022 to evaluate its analytical accuracy using neonatal buccal mucosal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Positive NIPT results were followed by amniocentesis, whereas negative results were systematically validated by postnatal buccal mucosal FISH. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for trisomies 13, 18, and 21. Among 4466 women undergoing initial testing, a total of 4502 tests were performed, including 36 repeat tests after redraw. Of these tests, 4366 (97.0%) were negative, 73 (1.6%) were positive, and four (0.1%) yielded "no call" results after redraw. Sensitivity for trisomies 13, 18, and 21 was 94.6%, 100.0%, and 80.0%, respectively, with a specificity of 99.9% for all three conditions. The overall PPV was 89.1% and the NPV was 99.9%. Two false-negative cases (0.06%) were identified, both attributable to low-level mosaicism. Of the initial "no call" cases, 88.9% yielded reportable results after redraw. These findings demonstrate that SNP-based NIPT shows high analytical performance when validated with neonatal cytogenetic confirmation, while rare false-negative results due to mosaicism highlight the biological limitations of cfDNA-based screening and the importance of cytogenetic confirmation when ultrasound abnormalities are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.