Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243547›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2026

A socially assistive robot to support mental wellbeing in LGBTQ+ young people at risk of self-harm: a randomized controlled trial.

A Jess Williams, C Aubrey Rhodes, Seonaid Cleare, Rohan Borschmann, James J Gross, Kate Petrova, Lauren Posada, Christopher R Tench, Amelia Chapman-Nisar, Lucy Martin and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

A Jess Williams *Department of Informatics, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-3824
C Aubrey Rhodes *Department of Informatics, King's College London, London, UK.
Seonaid CleareUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2728-9356
Rohan BorschmannHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0365-7775
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kate PetrovaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lauren PosadaDepartment of Informatics, King's College London, London, UK.
Christopher R TenchDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Amelia Chapman-NisarInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lucy MartinInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Chris HollisNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR) MindTech MedTech Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ellen TownsendInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Petr SlovakDepartment of Informatics, King's College London, London, UK. petr.slovak@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-7715
Digital Youth research team

Funding

RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) RE19205RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) RE23499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LGBTQ+ youth commonly have unmet mental health needs and are at elevated risk for self-harm, yet many face persistent institutional barriers to accessing support. One impactful way to reduce risk and promote wellbeing is by supporting emotion regulation; that is, the process by which individuals can influence which emotions they feel, when they feel them and how they experience or express these emotions. This universal, modifiable process is widely considered a key transdiagnostic target for mental ill-health prevention and intervention efforts. We conducted a randomized controlled trial using Purrble, a socially assistive robot designed to provide in-the-moment emotion regulation support through intuitive tactile interaction. Between 12 January and 1 September 2024, 153 LGBTQ+ youth with self-harm ideation were randomized 1:1 to receive Purrble and safety planning (Purrble + SP) or safety planning alone (SP-Only), stratified by gender identity (50.3% transgender/gender diverse). Data were collected over 13 weeks, with data collection closing on 22 October 2024. The primary outcome was perceived emotion regulation difficulties at follow-up, adjusted for baseline, gender identity and age. Participants allocated to the Purrble intervention reported fewer emotion regulation difficulties at follow-up than those allocated to safety planning alone (adjusted mean difference: -3.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.92 to -1.16; P = 0.002; partial η

Indexed as

Mental HealthRoboticsSelf-Injurious BehaviorSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentEmotional RegulationEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePsychological Well-BeingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42243547
PMCPMC13279257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.