Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243524›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2026

Transcranial orbital approaches: comparison of the surgical access and the importance of the zygomatic arch removal.

Ahmet Faruk Ozdemir, Omer Furkan Turkis

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmet Faruk OzdemirDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Egitim Mahallesi Fahrettin Kerim Gökay Caddesi 161/14, Kadıköy, Istanbul, 34722, Turkey. dr.ahmetfarukozdemir@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7919-1609
Omer Furkan TurkisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kepez State Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2092-9859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orbital surgery may be encountered in neurosurgical practice because of the proximity of lesions to cranial structures and potential transcranial extension. Orbital surgery is divided into microsurgical and endoscopic approaches. Microsurgical techniques can be classified as transorbital or transcranial. To perform these surgical approaches, a thorough understanding of orbital anatomy is essential. Six cadaveric orbits from three silicone-injected adult heads were used in this study. Following a pterional craniotomy and orbitotomy, central, medial, and lateral transcranial approaches were performed to all specimens. Additionally, a modification to the lateral route was introduced. In this study, we discuss transcranial orbital approaches, identifying suitable approaches for specific lesion locations and highlighting their advantages through cadaveric dissections. Moreover, we demonstrate that the accessible surgical space can be expanded by incorporating a modification to the lateral transcranial approach. In orbital surgery, the appropriate surgical technique should be selected based on the lesion's location. Mastery of orbital anatomy is a prerequisite for these procedures, and the surgical exposure can be enhanced using the modifications described in our study.

Indexed as

Neurosurgical ProceduresOrbitZygomaCadaverCraniotomyHumansMicrosurgeryCadaver dissectionsOrbitOrbital surgeryTranscranial approachesZygomatic osteotomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.