ArticleScientific reports2026
A progressive fine-tuning strategy for domain-specific large language models in wastewater treatment plants safety.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The management of safety in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is faced with fundamental challenges, including sparse domain knowledge, dynamic evolution of safety protocols, and the necessity for highly reliable decision-making. While traditional risk assessment methods and expert systems provide essential support, they struggle to integrate multi-source heterogeneous knowledge to mitigate high-consequence, low-frequency(HCLF) risks. Existing general-purpose large language models (LLMs) demonstrate significant deficiencies in domain-specific knowledge, meanwhile, traditional fine-tuning methods are susceptible to catastrophic forgetting and knowledge conflicts during continual learning, rendering them unsuitable for direct application in this context. To address these challenges, this study proposes a progressive fine-tuning strategy to develop a domain-specific LLM tailored specifically for WWTP safety management. First, a domain-specific dataset is constructed through specialized dataset engineering. Subsequently, the proposed progressive fine-tuning strategy partitions domain knowledge into sequential stages, enabling the model to gradually learn and consolidate core knowledge at each stage before proceeding to the next. This orderly accumulation process ensures the deep integration of knowledge. The model is deployed and continuously optimized using vLLM, and direct preference optimization (DPO). The experimental results demonstrate that the progressive fine-tuning strategy effectively mitigates knowledge conflicts arising from multi-task fine-tuning. This approach not only ensures precise adherence to bottom-line safety protocols and enhances the model's depth of domain understanding in WWTP safety management, but also facilitates more coordinated capability allocation and knowledge integration across different professional tasks. By progressively refining the model, the proposed approach achieves superior task-specific performance even compared to models with substantially larger parameter scales, offering an effective and reproducible pathway for addressing analogous domain adaptation challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.