Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243451›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2026

Machine learning (ML) in intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM): proof of concept.

Varun Arvind, Anil Mendiratta, Omar Taha, Matthew Weintraub, Mehdi M Elfilali, Erik D Williams, Miles J Bomback, Michael G Vitale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Varun ArvindColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anil MendirattaColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Omar TahaEast Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA.
Matthew WeintraubRutgers Health New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Mehdi M ElfilaliColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. mme2145@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1347-022X
Erik D WilliamsColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Miles J BombackColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael G VitaleColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) improves safety during pediatric spinal deformity surgery by providing real-time neurophysiological assessment, enabling the earlier detection of neural compromise and the potential prevention of permanent injury. However, current IONM interpretation is subject to variability and relies on human expertise. This study evaluates a machine learning (ML) algorithm designed to identify subtle changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) that may precede neurological injury.

methodsIONM data from 84 pediatric spine surgeries at a single high-volume academic center were retrospectively analyzed. Fourteen patients experienced intraoperative MEP signal loss, with six developing postoperative deficits. An ML model was trained on baseline muscle specific MEPs from each patient to identify signal changes during surgery. The model continuously analyzed real-time MEP data, generating a similarity score relative to baseline. A "red flag" alert was triggered if signal deviation exceeded 10% per minute. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy, and compared against standard clinical alerts.

resultsThe model achieved 78.6% sensitivity, 67.1% specificity, 94.0% negative predictive value, and 69.0% overall accuracy (AUC = 0.78). ML-generated alerts preceded clinical IONM alerts by an average of 23.3 min. Among patients with postoperative deficits, 5 of 6 were correctly flagged.

conclusionThis ML-based tool demonstrated promising early detection of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes, often preceding clinical alerts. Its high sensitivity and negative predictive value suggest potential for real-time support during pediatric spine surgery. Further validation in larger, prospective cohorts is underway. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI)Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM)Machine Learning (ML)Spine surgery

Identifiers

PMID42243451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.