ArticleScientific reports2026
Byzantine robust federated learning for heterogeneous brain MRI using multisignal gradient fingerprinting and adaptive trust aggregation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Federated learning enables collaborative training across institutions without centralizing patient data, but remains vulnerable to malicious clients and severe non-IID data heterogeneity. We propose a trust-aware federated learning framework for brain MRI that combines multi-signal gradient fingerprinting with adaptive aggregation to achieve Byzantine robustness. Each client update is characterized by a six-dimensional fingerprint (variational-autoencoder reconstruction error, cosine similarity to a server reference, peer similarity, gradient norm, sign consistency, and Monte Carlo Shapley contribution). A dual-attention module and a reinforcement-learning controller map these signals into trust weights and integrate with FedBN-P (Federated Batch Normalization with Proximal regularization), an optimizer co-designed for stability under heterogeneous and adversarial conditions. We evaluate on MNIST, CIFAR-10, Alzheimer's MRI, and the OASIS brain-MRI cohort (approximately 87 test samples, used strictly as proof-of-concept) under both standard and strengthened threat models (up to 40% malicious clients). Attack-specific ablation confirms a defense-in-depth design: VAE fingerprinting is the primary noise-attack defense (3.60 pp accuracy drop upon removal), Shapley values safeguard accuracy under scaling (10.16 pp drop), and reinforcement learning improves detection consistency under dynamic attack schedules. Three-seed paired-test validation further shows detection F1 outperforms FLTrust by up to 44 pp on Non-IID Gaussian noise; a white-box adaptive attacker degrades the detector but not model accuracy, confirming the layered design. End-to-end wall-clock overhead is + 8.8% over FedAvg with identical communication volume. The framework achieves F1 above 0.98 for gradient-scaling attacks while preserving accuracy under magnitude-preserving attacks where explicit detection remains limited. Multi-site validation on larger federated cohorts (e.g., ADNI, UK Biobank, FeTS) is required before any clinical-deployment claim can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.