Trial reportScientific reports2026
Perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to erector spinae plane block for acute and chronic pain after cardiac surgery.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04313959 (Comparison of Two Anesthetic Techniques in Blocking the Erector Plane of the Spine Bilateral in Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Two Anesthetic Techniques in Blocking the Erector Plane of the Spine Bilateral in Cardiac Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain control after cardiac surgery remains suboptimal. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block offers a safer regional alternative to neuraxial techniques, but its duration is limited. We tested whether perineural dexamethasone added to bilateral ESP blocks reduces acute postoperative pain intensity and attenuates chronic post surgical pain (CPSP) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In this randomized, double-blind trial (NCT04313959), 43 patients undergoing elective CABG received bilateral ESP blocks with 0.2% ropivacaine alone (control, n = 21) or ropivacaine plus 8 mg perineural dexamethasone (dexamethasone, n = 22). Primary outcome: pain intensity at rest on postoperative day 1, measured using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Pre-specified secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation duration, 48-hour opioid consumption, and pain interference at 30, 60, and 90 days measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The primary outcome was not significantly different between groups: NRS pain at rest on day 1 was 1.35 ± 1.95 (control) vs. 1.57 ± 2.27 (dexamethasone), p = 0.781 (Fig. 1). Acute pain scores and 48-hour opioid consumption were comparable (Fig. 3). Mechanical ventilation was shorter in the dexamethasone group (median 11.6 vs. 14.7 h; p = 0.041; Table 2). At 30 days, no significant between-group differences were found in any BPI domain (all p > 0.05; Table 3). At 60 days, pain intensity scores were lower in the dexamethasone group (composite score 0.47 ± 0.88 vs. 1.21 ± 1.28; p = 0.019; Table 3; Fig. 2). By 90 days, all outcomes were comparable (all p > 0.05). One procedure-related adverse event occurred (pneumothorax, control group). Addition of dexamethasone to ropivacaine did not add to the reduction of acute pain. The secondary exploratory findings of shorter mechanical ventilation time and lower pain intensity at 60 days are hypothesis-generating and should be evaluated using larger, adequately powered multicenter trials with intraoperative blinding and a systemic comparator arm.Trial registry: NCT04313959.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.