Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243419›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to erector spinae plane block for acute and chronic pain after cardiac surgery.

Luis Alberto Rodriguez Linares, Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez, Vanessa Henriques Carvalho, Lais Helena Navarro E Lima, Suely Pereira Zeferino, Juliana Oliveira Carneiro, Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04313959 (Comparison of Two Anesthetic Techniques in Blocking the Erector Plane of the Spine Bilateral in Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04313959 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of Two Anesthetic Techniques in Blocking the Erector Plane of the Spine Bilateral in Cardiac Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto do CoracaoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsSpine Erector, Cardiac Surgery, Acute Pain, Chronic PainArmsRopivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution, Ropivacaine 0.2% + Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luis Alberto Rodriguez LinaresUniversity of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil. luisro0729@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1146-1841
Raquel Chacon Ruiz MartinezHospital Sirio-Libanes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa Henriques CarvalhoUNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.
Lais Helena Navarro E LimaUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Suely Pereira ZeferinoUniversity of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Oliveira CarneiroUniversity of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes GalasUniversity of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain control after cardiac surgery remains suboptimal. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block offers a safer regional alternative to neuraxial techniques, but its duration is limited. We tested whether perineural dexamethasone added to bilateral ESP blocks reduces acute postoperative pain intensity and attenuates chronic post surgical pain (CPSP) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In this randomized, double-blind trial (NCT04313959), 43 patients undergoing elective CABG received bilateral ESP blocks with 0.2% ropivacaine alone (control, n = 21) or ropivacaine plus 8 mg perineural dexamethasone (dexamethasone, n = 22). Primary outcome: pain intensity at rest on postoperative day 1, measured using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Pre-specified secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation duration, 48-hour opioid consumption, and pain interference at 30, 60, and 90 days measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The primary outcome was not significantly different between groups: NRS pain at rest on day 1 was 1.35 ± 1.95 (control) vs. 1.57 ± 2.27 (dexamethasone), p = 0.781 (Fig. 1). Acute pain scores and 48-hour opioid consumption were comparable (Fig. 3). Mechanical ventilation was shorter in the dexamethasone group (median 11.6 vs. 14.7 h; p = 0.041; Table 2). At 30 days, no significant between-group differences were found in any BPI domain (all p > 0.05; Table 3). At 60 days, pain intensity scores were lower in the dexamethasone group (composite score 0.47 ± 0.88 vs. 1.21 ± 1.28; p = 0.019; Table 3; Fig. 2). By 90 days, all outcomes were comparable (all p > 0.05). One procedure-related adverse event occurred (pneumothorax, control group). Addition of dexamethasone to ropivacaine did not add to the reduction of acute pain. The secondary exploratory findings of shorter mechanical ventilation time and lower pain intensity at 60 days are hypothesis-generating and should be evaluated using larger, adequately powered multicenter trials with intraoperative blinding and a systemic comparator arm.Trial registry: NCT04313959.

Indexed as

Acute PainCardiac Surgical ProceduresChronic PainDexamethasoneNerve BlockPostoperative PainAgedCoronary Artery BypassDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRopivacaineTreatment OutcomeDexamethasoneRopivacaineCABGCardiac surgeryChronic post surgical painCPSPDexamethasoneErector spinae plane blockRegional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42243419
PMCPMC13473455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.