ArticleScientific reports2026
Public announcements and mask use during COVID-19 bridging regression and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of public health policies has a major impact on society. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, policy-makers worldwide introduced various public health measures, such as social distancing and mask-wearing, to address the severe threat posed by the disease. Despite the importance of these issues, there has been no direct, visual evidence that mask-related policies led to the appropriate mask-wearing behaviour of the general public. Here, we show that regulations and public transport announcements encouraged correct mask-wearing behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, changes in announcement and regulation contents led to heterogeneous effects on behaviour. Our study contributes the first visual open-source empirical analysis of reactive human behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic, investigating how compliant a general population is to mask-wearing policy. We combine object-detection-based convolutional neural networks, regression analysis and multilayer perceptrons to analyse visual data of the Viennese public during 2020. By comparing the predictive power of regression analysis and neural networks, we demonstrate that the neural networks provide more accurate predictions of population response during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, our use of regression modelling allows us to uncover possible causal pathways underlying societal behaviour. Since our findings underscore the importance of appropriate communication content, our work will facilitate more effective non-pharmaceutical interventions in future public health crises. Lastly, we demonstrate that the use of regression modelling and neural networks need not be mutually exclusive in the study of complex systems but can instead complement each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.