ArticleScientific reports2026
Physiological homeostasis, yield, and sugar profile of salt-stressed sugar beet plants as influenced by nano-structured mixture of zinc, boron, and molybdenum application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugar beet is a key industrial crop valued for its sucrose content, but its yield and sugar profile are greatly affected by soil salinity. In this study, we introduce novel nano-structured zinc (Zn), boron (B), and molybdenum (Mo) mixture designed to mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress. While individual nano-micronutrient applications have been investigated, the potential of combined nano-micronutrient formulations still need to be clarified. A two-season field experiments evaluated the effect of a nano-structured Zn, B, and Mo (MMNPs) mixture on salt-stressed sugar beet. Treatments included applied once (MMNPs1) or twice (MMNPs2) applications of MMNPs, their bulk counterparts (MMB1 or MMB2), and a control treatment (CK). Physiological traits, yield attributes, and sugar profile were assessed. The findings of this study pointed out that application of MMNPs2 and MMB2 treatments improved growth, photosynthetic efficiency, productivity, and juice quality compared with CK, MMNPs1, and MMB1, with MMNPs2 showing the greatest effects. Relative to CK, MMNPs2 increased net assimilation rate, absolute crop growth rate, taproot dry weight, taproot length, and taproot diameter by 3.87-, 6.14-, 1.98-, 1.24-, and 1.20-fold, respectively. It also enhanced chlorophyll a by 78.3%, chlorophyll b by 163.1%, carotenoids by 50.4%, F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.