Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243394›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

A comparative analysis of preoperative single-dose antimicrobial therapy versus extended postoperative antimicrobial regimen in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

S M Gurutham Prahalad Reddy, P V Raghuveer Pratap, A Ajay Raja, P Nikhil Bharadwaj

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S M Gurutham Prahalad ReddyDepartment of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1683-3397
P V Raghuveer PratapDepartment of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, India.
A Ajay RajaDepartment of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6526-3243
P Nikhil BharadwajDepartment of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, India. pb3841@srmist.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder stones are the most prevalent condition affecting the biliary system, with varying incidence rates worldwide. Given the low occurrence of post-operative infections following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the necessity of prophylactic antibiotic administration is often debated. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that a single pre-operative dose of antibiotics is just as effective as multiple doses. This study aims to compare the effects of single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, specifically regarding post-operative infection-related complications. This prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, Tamil-Nadu for a period of 18 months. Patients were randomly allocated into the study and control groups using a computer-generated simple randomization sequence in a 1:1 allocation ratio. No block randomization or stratification based on age, ASA grade, or other baseline variables was applied, and single dose of cefoperazone and sulbactam given at the time of induction to one group and in the other group cefoperazone + sulbactum 1 gm 1-0-1 was continued post-operatively in the other group for 5 days and Allocation concealment was ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE), which were opened only after patient enrolment. Patients were followed up for four weeks to study the post-operative infections and related complications. Due to the nature of the intervention (single-dose vs. extended antibiotic regimen), blinding was not feasible. The study was therefore conducted as an open-label trial. The majority of participants were between 31 and 40 years old, with a slightly higher proportion of males compared to females. Baseline characteristics were largely comparable between the two groups, except for a significantly higher proportion of ASA Grade II patients in the single-dose group compared to the extended-regimen group (77.8% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.034). The growth of organisms showed no variation between the two groups, and the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) was comparable, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Surgical site infection occurred in 3 of 45 patients (6.7%) in the single-dose group and 2 of 45 patients (4.4%) in the extended postoperative antibiotic group. This difference was not statistically significant p value 0.900. Single-dose prophylactic antibiotic administered at the induction of anesthesia is just as effective as multiple-dose antibiotic therapy continued post-operatively in preventing post-operative infections among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicSurgical Wound InfectionAdultCefoperazoneElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareProspective StudiesSulbactamAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefoperazoneSulbactamAnesthesiaGallstonesProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID42243394
PMCPMC13478618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.